Wednesday, September 17, 2008

How Long Chicken Pox Virus Survies In Air

European Position: European guidelines for diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women Women

Análisis de La Posición Europea: Guías europeas para el diagnóstico y manejo de la osteoporosis en la mujer postmenopáusica

Thursday September 18, 2008

European Position Analysis: European guidelines for diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women


Urdinola Jaime MD
Medical Association Andes CS AK 9116 20 326 Bogotá DC Colombia
Phone 571/215 23 00
e-mail: jaimeurdinolamd@gmail.com - blogger: http://www.urdinola.blogspot.com / www.urdinolamenopausia2.blogspot.com
Symposium / Luncheon on Women's Health and Menopause
Andes Medical Association Board Room - Thursday, September 18, 2008


Background The European Foundation for Osteoporosis and Bone Disease (later established as the International Osteoporosis Foundation) published in 1997 the first Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis. Those discussed here are the most recent, published in electronic form in February 2008 1.

For reasons of space and time, emphasis will be summarized in aspects such as bone mineral density, the concept of osteopenia, general management measures, major pharmacological interventions available type and use the web through the instrument developed by WHO to calculate for the next 10 years, the probability of hip fracture or major osteoporotic fracture.

is suggested that other interesting subjects that can be found in the publication referred to, as the quantification of the burden of osteoporosis and the calculation of disability and lost life years (DALYs called in English) expansion of information on techniques for measuring bone mineral, the possibility of using combined and sequential treatments, adherence to treatment and the control thereof, other ways of assessing fracture risk, the investigation of patients with osteoporosis and health economics related to osteoporosis, will be consulted directly on it.
The most common sites for osteoporotic fractures are vertebral column, hip, distal forearm and proximal humerus. The remaining probability over the life of a menopausal woman to suffer fractures in any of these sites is approx. 40%, compared with 12% for breast cancer. Fractures in addition to being a major cause of morbidity, also can cause pain, loss of function, need for hospitalization and slow recovery and rehabilitation often incomplete. They can also be asymptomatic and recurrent as in the case of vertebral fractures and their social and personal costs are high. Also concerned that most / osteoporosis patients remain untreated.
measures bone mineral density (BMD) In \u200b\u200baddition to providing a diagnostic criterion, BMD measurements should indicate the prognosis of the likelihood of future fractures and a baseline that allows monitoring the natural history of the condition treated or not.
The currently used technique is DXA (dual energy absorptiometry of X-rays), which is very sensitive to tissue calcium content, which bone is the most important. Other techniques include quantitative ultrasound (QUS), quantitative computed tomography (QCT) applied to the appendicular skeleton and spine, peripheral DXA, the digital radiogrametría X-ray, X-ray absorptiometry. X-ray technology can also determine bone strength of cortical bone and trabecular bone, including macro and micro.

Prevalence of osteoporosis
Using the criteria of the World Health Organization (WHO) the prevalence of osteoporosis in Sweden is approx. 6% in men and 21% in women 50 to 84 years age. In other words, men over 50 years is 3 times less frequent than in women, which is comparable to the difference in the risk for osteoporotic fractures among men and women. Although the International Society for Clinical Densitometry recommends that BMD is determined both lumbar spine and hip, does not improve the prediction using multiple sites to determine BMD. Osteopenia

should not be considered osteopenia as a disease category. It is useful to the description of osteopenia for purposes of the epidemiology of osteoporosis and to identify patients who will develop osteoporosis Over the next 10 years.
Limitations of the application of DXA The presence of osteomalacia as a complication of malnutrition in elderly patients with decreased BMD due to decreased bone mineralization. The osteartrosis and osteoarthritis of the spine and hip are common in the elderly, increasing BMD, but not its strength. Osteoarthritis, a previous fracture or scoliosis produce heterogeneity of BMD and should be excluded from the analysis. As BMD is two dimensional and measure the area and no bone volume, the volume of bone density is increased. This error will be beneficial to the extent that large bones have more strength.

General management
Mobility and falls
Immobilization is a major cause of bone loss. The loss for one week of immobilization in bed can be equivalent to the annual loss. The exercise is therefore integral to the management and rehabilitation after a fracture. It should also pay special attention to preventing falls, especially in patients at risk, corrected visual acuity decreased, reducing the consumption of drugs that alter alertness and balance and improve the conditions of the home. Nutrition
The elderly high prevalence failure of calcium, protein and vitamin D. Adequate amount of protein intake is necessary to maintain the integrity and function of organs such as skeletal muscles and bones. Calcium supplements for at least 1 000 mg / day and vitamin D at doses of 800 IU per day reduced the risk of secondary hyperparathyroidism and the risk of proximal femoral fracture, and 1 g / kg of body weight per day of protein for management of patients with osteoporosis. Main

pharmacological interventions
SERMS (selective estrogen receptor modulators)
SERMs are agents related nonsteroidal estrogen receptor, acting as agonists or antagonists of estrogen, depending on the tissue where the action is exercised. The concept started to observe the action of tamoxifen, an antagonist in breast tissue but a partial agonist on the bone, reduce bone loss in postmenopausal women. At present, raloxifene is the only SERM approved available for prevention and treatment of osteoporosis, reducing 30-50% the risk of vertebral fracture in postmenopausal women with decreased BMD or osteoporosis with or without previous vertebral fracture. Has not shown significant reduction in nonvertebral fractures. In the MORE trial and in placebo-controlled follow-up for 4 years, CORE study, the rare but serious adverse event was increased deep venous thromboembolism. The significant and sustained decrease in risk for invasive breast cancer was nearly 60% in high-risk population. The RUTH trial in postmenopausal women at high risk for cardiovascular disease showed no effects on cardiovascular death or the incidence of coronary heart disease or stroke. ●
Bisphosphonates are stable analogues of pyrophosphate. The power of those who have been synthesized depends on the chain length and structure side. They have a great affinity for the apatite, both in vitro and in vivo, which is the basis for clinical use. Are potent inhibitors of bone resorption, exerting their effect by reducing the recruitment and activity of osteoclasts and increasing apoptosis. Its potency to inhibit bone resorption varies greatly, and its range extends to 10 000 times in vitro. This allows us to understand why vary the doses used clinically.

anti-fracture efficacy of the treatments most frequently used in postmenopausal osteoporosis when given with calcium and vitamin D, randomized and placebo-controlled

Effect on risk Effect on vertebral fracture vertebral fracture risk
establecidaa Agent osteoporosis osteoporosis osteoporosis osteoporosis establecidaa
Alendronate + + ND + including hip
Risedronate + + ND + including hip
Ibandronate ND ND + + b
zoledronate + + ND ND + c
TH + + + + + +
Raloxifene Teriparatide
ND ND ND + ND +
ranelate + + + + includes hip hip includes

Strontium Osteoporosis osteoporosis = - + = effective medication - ND = no available evidence - a = woman previous vertebral fracture
- b = only in subgroups of patients (post-study analysis) - c = JWG patients / without prevalent vertebral fractures - Updated as 2-3 in 1

The oral availability is low, between 1 to 3% of the dose taken and interfered with by food, calcium, iron, coffee, tea and orange juice. Are purged rapidly from plasma, 50% deposited in bone and the remainder excreted in the urine. Its half-life is prolonged.

Risedronate 35 mg weekly and alendronate 70 mg weekly are most commonly used bisphosphonates in the world.

In the FIT study, alendronate shown to reduce the incidence of vertebral, wrist and hip in approximately half of the cases, women with prevalent vertebral fractures. In women without prevalent vertebral fractures, there was no significant reduction in clinical fractures in the total population, although the reduction was significant in 1 / 3 of patients had a T value of baseline in hip BMD ˂ -2.5 standard deviations. Risedronate

shown to reduce the incidence of vertebral and non vertebral fractures by 40 to 50% and 30 to 36%, respectively. In a large population of elderly women Risedronate significantly reduced the risk of hip fracture by 30% and the effect was greater among women aged 70 to 79 years old with osteoporosis, 40%.

dose ibandronate 2.5 mg daily reduces the risk of vertebral fractures by 50 - 60%, while the effect on nonvertebral fractures has only been demonstrated so far in postestudio analysis of women with a baseline value of T in BMD ˂ - 3 standard deviations. A noninferiority trial has shown the equivalence of the oral dose of 150 mg monthly, allowing approval for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Similarly, comparative studies between oral and IV doses led to the adoption of the IV dose of 3 mg.

A Phase III study of postmenopausal women with 7 500 osteoporosis to determine the effectiveness of the annual infusion of 5 mg zoledronate for 3 years found that the incidence of vertebral fractures was reduced by 70% and 40% hip.

Etidronate is a weak bisphosphonate proven to reduce vertebral fractures after 2 years of use but not thereafter, without significant effect on nonvertebral fractures. For this reason it is not recommended as first-line treatment for osteoporosis

should be emphasized that the safety profile of bisphosphonates is generally favorable. Oral bisphosphonates are associated with mild gastrointestinal disorders and some of them, alendronate and pamidronate, may rarely cause esophagitis. Aminobisphosphonates IV can induce a transient acute reaction with fever and muscle and bone pain, which usually disappears or decreases in the course of the following applications. Osteonecrosis of the jaw has been described in cancer patients receiving large doses of pamidronate or zoledronate. The incidence in osteoporotic patients treated with oral and IV bisphosphonates appear to be extremely low, about 1 in 100 000 cases and so far the causal relationship to bisphosphonate therapy has not been established. ●

Peptides and family of parathyroid hormone (PTH)
continuous endogenous production of PTH, assessed in the primary or secondary hyperparathyroidism, or exogenous administration can lead to deleterious consequences for the skeleton, particularly on cortical huesio. But intermittent administration, such as daily SC injections may increase the number and activity of osteoblasts, increasing bone mass and improving bone architecture at sites of cancellous and cortical bone. The intact molecule has amino acids 1 to 84 and teriparatide N-terminal fragments 1 to 34, the latter being equivalent in their respective molecular weight to 40% of the PTH. These 2 agents have been shown to significantly reduce the risk vertebral fractures and teriparatide has also shown an effect on nonvertebral fractures during studies of 18 to 24 months, with beneficial effects of teriparatide on nonvertebral fractures that persist 30 months after its suspension. The most common side effects are nausea, pain in limbs, headaches and dizziness. The transient elevation of calcium in normocalcemic patients peaks between 4 and 6 h, returning to baseline 16 to 24 h after each dose. This change is small and does not require calcium values \u200b\u200bmonitored during treatment. The incidence of hypercalciuria is no different from what occurs in patients treated with placebo. However, these agents should be used with caution in patients with active or recent urolithiasis. Have reported transient episodes of hypotension, which spend a few hours later and do not prohibit continued treatment. Peptides are contraindicated in conditions teriparatide increased bone turnover, as in the case of hypercalcaemia, metabolic bone diseases such as primary osteoporosis, including hyperparathyroidism, Paget's disease of bone, unexplained elevation of alkaline phosphatase, or external radiation through the implantation of the skeleton in patients with skeletal malignancies or bone metastases. Kidney failure is another contraindication. Although teriparatide studies in rats administered high doses and for prolonged time have shown increased incidence of osteosarcoma, this does not seem to be relevant in humans treated with much lower doses. ●

strontium ranelate
is an agent recently approved for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis to reduce the risk of vertebral and hip fractures. The evidence indicates that inhibits bone resorption and stimulates bone formation. Studies conducted over 5 years have proven effective in a wide range of patients, both those with osteopenia to women 80 years with osteoporosis, with or without previous vertebral fracture. The decrease risk is similar to that observed with oral bisphosphonates. The recommended daily dose is one sachet daily oral 2 g, whose absorption is reduced by food, milk or milk, ideally administered at bedtime and 2 hours after eating. Not recommended for use in patients with renal failure. The most common side effects are nausea and diarrhea, generally mild and transient, reported at the beginning of treatment and usually disappear after the third month of treatment. Has reported an increased incidence of venous thromboembolism, when analyzed together all Phase III studies, but has not established a causal link with medicine. Regulatory authorities, therefore, not considered contraindicated in patients with a history of thromboembolism but should be used cautiously in these patients.

● Calcitonin
As endogenous polypeptide hormone inhibits osteoclastic resorption. The salmon is 40 - 50 times more potent than human, the most used clinically. It can be used in injectable form or nasal. The latter provides a biological activity of 25 to 50% of the injected form. Calcitonin modestly increases lumbar spine BMD and forearm, reducing the risk of vertebral fracture, but the magnitude of impact on these fractures is questionable and its effect on nonvertebral fractures still equivocal. You can have an analgesic effect in women with acute vertebral fracture, which appears to be an independent effect of its effects on bone resorption of osteoclasts. Repeated injections or the high cost of the nasal formulation prevents its use as first-line treatment for osteoporosis. ●

hormonal therapy (HT) in menopausal sex steroids
Estrogens reduce the accelerated bone turnover induced menopause and prevent bone loss at all skeletal sites, regardless of age and duration treatment.
Observational studies and randomized controlled trials with placebo have shown that estrogen reduces the risk of vertebral and nonvertebral, including hip, about 30% regardless of baseline BMD.
But when HT is discontinued, bone loss is restarted at the same rate that occurs after menopause, although the fracture protection may persist for several years.
The findings of the WHI study (Study of the Health Initiative of Women) suggests however, that the long-term risks outweigh the benefits, 30% increase in risk for coronary heart disease and breast cancer, as well as 40 % de aumento en el riesgo para accidente cerebrovascular.
Mujeres histerectomizadas que recibieron sólo estrógenos conjugados presentaron aumento significativo para accidente cerebrovascular, pero no en enfermedad cardíaca coronaria ni en cáncer de seno, sugiriendo un efecto deletéreo del acetato de medroxiprogesterona. Aún se debate exdtensamente si los beneficios de la TH con otro tipo de gestágeno y en mujeres postmenopáusicas jóvenes podrían exceder los riesgos, pero no hay disponible un estudio aleatorizado y controlado con placebo que demuestre la seguridad a largo plazo de esta alternativa.
Finalmente, se debe recordar que en la mayoría de países del mundo, el uso de la TH sólo está approved for the management of menopausal symptoms in the lowest dose possible and for a limited period of time.
So today is not recommended as first line therapy treatment for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. ●

vitamin D derivatives
Alfacalcidol is a synthetic analogue of calcitriol metabolite (1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D) and is metabolized to calcitriol in the liver, although less potent than the latter. Several studies of both agents showed a decrease in vertebral fracture risk, but their effects on BMD have been less studied. Some reports speak of their direct positive effect on muscle strength, decreasing the likelihood of falls, especially in the elderly. But the biggest problem with the use of derivatives of vitamin Des risk of hypercalcemia and hypercalciuria, which in prolonged can lead to renal failure and nephrocalcinosis. The narrow therapeutic window requires frequent monitoring of serum and urinary calcium in these patients. Therefore, calcium supplementation should be avoided or used with great care. ●
algorithm developed by WHO
That integrates clinical risk factors for fracture with fracture risk developed with or without information on BMD, developed by the Collaborating Centre for Metabolic Diseases WHO in Sheffield, UK. Called FRAX and calculates the probability at 10 years of hip fracture or major osteoporotic fracture.
http://shef.ac.uk/FRAX

Summary of Important

● The International Osteoporosis Foundation provides some updated guidelines for diagnosis and management of osteoporosis, reviewing the role of determining bone mineral density for the diagnosis, assessment of fracture risk general management and drug therapy, treatment control, how to do research for patients and economic analysis of treatment

References

1 - Kanis JA, Burlet N, Cooper C , Delmas PD, Reginster JY, Borgstrom F, Rizzoli R, European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis (ESCE). European
guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal Women. Osteoporosis Int 2008, 19: 399-428.
2 - Delmas PD. Treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis . Lancet 2002, 359: 2018-2026.
3 - Boonen S, Body JJ Boutsen Y, Devogelaer JP, Goemaere S, Kaufman JM, et al. Evidence-based guidelines for the Treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: a consensus document of the Belgian Bone Club. Osteoporosis Int 2005, 16: 239-254.

If you have any comments, questions or concerns, you can "click" on comments and sending your message. Or if you prefer, you can send your comments, questions or concerns e-mail jaimeurdinolamd@gmail.com

Tuesday, July 29, 2008

Under Tank Heater Leopard

Etifoxina in maladaptive and Anxiety

Wednesday July 30, 2008
in Women's Etifoxina maladaptive Anxiety and

Jaime Urdinola
MD Medical Association Andes CS AK 9116 20 326 Bogotá DC Colombia
Phone 571/215 23 00
Symposium / Luncheon on Women's Health and Medical MenopausiaAsociación
Andes Boardroom - Wednesday, July 30, 2008


Anxiety often occurs in any medical consultation. Nor is the exception in the office of women, specifically women 40 to 54 years. According to data INTE (Therapeutic Index of Diseases) in Colombia for June 2007, meaning 14.7% of consultations in this age group.

Adjustment Disorder (or also known as adjustment disorder) and anxiety (TAA), which considered many clinicians and researchers as a marginal diagnostic category, is often seen by psychiatrists, but ignored or unknown in clinical practice general despite its relatively high prevalence. She recently appeared as such in the DSM, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Reports from France

consider the prevalence of 9.2% if associated with other psychiatric disorders. Is considered "pure" form of 4.5% to occur in 1% of the general population in primary care clinic. Women represent 2 / 3 of the cases diagnosed, mean age 42 years and most have a professional activity. Major life events are associated with problems at work (23.1%), followed by a family illness (9.0%) or a serious personal illness or accident (7.7%). The average duration is 2.32 months. In 91% of cases are considered necessary psychological or pharmacological treatment, prescribing an anxiolytic (64.9% of cases), followed by an antidepressant (10.8% of cases) or a hypnotic (8.1%) 1. During the past

II International Medical and Mental Health of Women, held in Medellin from 14 to 16 February this year, Dr. Jorge Mario Tamayo, a psychiatrist at the University of Antioquia and pharmacology experts, made the following notations for our country, based on the National Survey of Mental Health, Colombia, 2003 2, which can be found online at the following link: http://www.abacolombia.org. co / bv / clinic / estudio_salud_mental_colombia.pdf

● Prevalence of any psychiatric disorder

- Ever

40.1% - 16.0% Last 12 Months

- 30 days 7.4%

● Prevalence of Anxiety Disorders

- Colombia

19.3% - 21.7% Bogotá

As noted earlier, the reasons for consultation are different and the patient, including women, rarely manifest in a clear and spontaneous that it is anxiety. The doctor well the diagnosis must distinguish between the TAA that carries a real anxiety disorder and anxiety normal adaptation, properly orienting the patient, ensuring the improvement in symptoms and quality of life. TAA is defined as a state of anxiety and emotional disorder that usually interferes with social life and appears as an adjustment to a stressful life change, with the following features to the diagnosis:

- significant anxiety symptoms (anxiety, impatience , irritability),
present within 3 months after the occurrence of one or more identifiable stressors
- Clinical Implications: - Suffering marked and more intense than expected in reaction to the stressor
- social functioning, school or occupational deteriorated
- independent of any other psychiatric disorder or affliction
- TAA remains less than 6 months after removal of the stressor, but may
become chronic (more than 6 months), if the stressors persist

Other symptoms may include marked fatigue, persistent sleep disorders or somatic signs without demonstrable organic etiology (several eruptions, nonspecific pain, etc.).

Other diagnoses that should be discarded: - Depression - Dysthymia (the same number and intense depressive symptoms that persist for at least 2 years without any real interruption) - Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) - Statement of acute stress or chronic post-traumatic - Other anxiety disorders characterized (phobia, panic disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder) - anxious state induced directly by drug use, drug, alcohol or physical illness. Towards

most serious psychiatric disorders listed above may evolve a patient not treated. Also to a disorder of eating patterns or alcohol or drug addiction.

20 to 50% of cases, according to colleagues Psychiatrists warrant treatment. Psychotherapy is effective, but requires expertise. Pharmacological options may be beneficial, taking into account that reduce the suffering and anxiety that do not affect cognitive functions. Among the most commonly used drugs are mainly anxiolytics, antidepressants, hypnotics, and antihistamines.

Benzodiazepines (BZD) have been the most commonly used for treatment of acute stress and anxiety, as potent positive modulators and active acid neurotransmitter gamma-amino butyric acid (GABA) inhibits the central nervous system (CNS ) by fixation the binding site specific GABAA receptor, or subrecipient of BZD. Another neuromodulator allosteric (compound adjust the three dimensional structure of the receptor, as in this case increasing its activity) of the GABA receptor, especially important in women, is the neurosteroid alopregnenolona, \u200b\u200bwhich is set in another place, another receptor subtype selective. The research has been directed therefore to find new drugs than the previous ones, with more selective effects, in this case on anxiety.

Given the above, Etifoxina (exsist ®) represents a concrete and innovative application in the treatment of anxiety, through a dual mechanism of transmission GABA, stimulating its receptor inhibit transmission by allosteric site different from the BD, close to the chloride channel. It also stimulates the production of neurosteroids have anxiolytic effects as alopregnenolona, \u200b\u200ballowing respect the patient's cognitive abilities like memory, attention and vigilance without inducing habituation or drug or produce amnesia or sedation, such as the BD. Belongs to the class of benzoxazines, which is very different from the BD. Your dosage is one capsule of 50 mg 3-4 times a day for a maximum time recommended 12 weeks. It is not recommended while taking alcohol as it increases its sedative effect. The adverse effects most frequently reported were skin diseases like rashes, few allergic manifestations such as urticaria and Quincke edema. Is mainly eliminated via the urine.

From the clinical point of view there have been several representative studies. In a parallel double-masked, noninferiority study compared the clinical efficacy of Etifoxina 50 mg 3 times a day in front of a BZD, lorazepam at 0.5 - 0.5 - 1 mg daily, in 191 outpatients, 66% female , on day 7 and 28 of treatment using the HAM to anxiety, clinical global impression scale and the scale of social adjustment among other measures. The two drugs were equivalent at day 28. More patients with Etifoxina markedly improved (p = 0.03) and no side effects (p = 0.04). One month after stopping treatment, fewer patients had Etifoxina rebound anxiety compared with lorazepam (p = 0.034) 3.

Another double-masked study in 170 patients over 4 weeks (approx. 73% of women in both groups), comparing Etifoxina (150-200 mg daily) with buspirone (15-20 mg daily) for 4 weeks showed clinical efficacy and safety of both compounds, although not equivalent, being superior Etifoxina. The scale of improvement and global performance index showed significant improvement in the group with Etifoxina from day 7 (Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric 0.01) 4 .

Recently in the year 2008, Encephale magazine publishes a special issue on Etifoxina 5 , which Besnier and Blin 6 review recent clinical studies showing that more effective Etifoxina buspirone and produces a more favorable clinical response to lorazepam.

is concluded that the rapid onset of clinical effect Etifoxina and that its safety profile may be of great interest for the management of TAA as an excellent alternative to conventional anti-anxiety treatments.

Highlights
● The TAA is a very common problem also in Colombian women, the
altering their quality of life and whose diagnosis is unknown and ignored
● Failure to identify and treat the TAA may lead to psychiatric disorders

serious
● The BZD anxiolytics were the most used so far, but
create


● Etifoxina drug for rapid clinical effect and safety profile appropriate without

create habituation is an excellent option for the TAA

References
1 - W Semaan, Hergueta T, Bloch J, Charpak Y, Duburcq A, Le Guern ME, AlquierC, Rouillon F. [Cross-sectional study of the Prevalence of Adjustment disorder with anxiety in general practice]. Encephale. 2001, 27: 238-44.
2 - A national picture of health and mental illness in Colombia: PRELIMINARY REPORT. Estudio Nacional de Salud Mental, Colombia, 2003. Ministerio de la Protección Social. República de Colombia.
3- Nguyen N, Fakra E, Pradel V, Jouve E, Alquier C,Le Guern ME, Micallef J, Blin O. Efficacy of etifoxine compared to lorazepam monotherapy in the treatment of patients with adjustment disorders with anxiety: a double-blind controlled study in general practice.Hum Psychopharmacol. 2006; 21:139-49.
4- Servant D, Graziani PL, Moyse D, Parquet PJ. Treatment of adjustment disorder with anxiety: efficacy and tolerance of etifoxine in a double-blind controlled study. Encephale. 1998; 24:569-74.
5- Besnier N, Blin O. Étifoxine: etudes cliniques récentes. Encephale.2008, 34 (S1) :9-14.
6 - Etifoxine: A Regard sur le nouveau et l'anxietas recepteur GABA. Encephale.2008, 34 (S1): 1-43.

If you have any comments, questions or concerns, you can "click" on comments and submit your mensaje.O if you prefer, you can send your comments, questions or concerns e-mail @ jaimeurdinolamd gmail.com

Tuesday, March 25, 2008

Optiplex Gx620 & 64bit

Looking for Human Papilloma Virus

March 26, 2008

Looking
Human Papilloma Virus

Looking Human Papilloma Virus

Urdinola Jaime MD
Medical Association Andes CS AK 9116 20 326 Bogotá DC Colombia
Phone 571/215 23 00
e-mail: jaimeurdinolamd@gmail.com - jurdinol@uniandes.edu.co
blogger: http://www.urdinola.blogspot.com/ www.urdinolamenopausia2.blogspot.com
Symposium / Luncheon on Women's Health and Menopause
Medical Association de los Andes - Board Room - Wednesday, March 26, 2008





Introduction
prevention programs for cervical cancer, initiated since the early sixties in the United States (U.S.) have been based until now on cervical-vaginal cytology (CCV). Although these programs have reduced cervical cancer incidence in many industrialized countries between 20 and 90%, the limited sensitivity of cervical cytology - range from 30 to 87% 1 - makes the maintenance of these programs is difficult and expensive 2.

The latest figure known in Colombia uterine cancer mortality (without discrimination if the cervix or body) is that of 2126 cases in 2005 3.

test DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) to locate and identify HPV

Since 2007 is available to gynecologists in Colombia a test for finding the high-risk types of human papilloma virus (HPV), through hybrid capture technique (CH2-HPV). With the arrival of this review, which is considered slightly more sensitive and less specific - only in women under 30 years - the CCV, the question arises whether in the coming years will witness the change in the pursuit of cervical cancer only through this technique. Now is expected to be used initially by a combination of CCV and CH2-HPV, but as more data are known to search large studies of cervical cancer, is likely to become clear that the LCC will provide little advantage over the use of CH2-HPV in a unique way. Therefore, to the future, CH2-HPV would be used for search and CCV reserved as a step to determine which HPV-positive women require additional colposcopy for follow up.

For purposes of the last decade before the present century much progress was achieved in understanding the pathogenesis of cervical cancer. Today we know invasive cervical cancer that is caused by infection with one or more of approximately 15 high-risk HPV or oncogenic, which can be detected specifically with the 2 nd test. generation of molecular type, which can overcome the limitations of the search by CCV.

This could provide greater protection for women against cervical cancer, although it would be desirable and necessary that the cost is lower in the future. The molecular test most widely used today in clinical specimens is evidence of hybridization in solution called Hybrid Capture 2 (hc2).

The company produces, initially called Digene Diagnostics, Gaithersburg, MD U.S. Identifies high-risk HPV 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59 and 68 in a test designed to "pool". Has been approved by the FDA (Federal Drug Administration Food and USA) and widely applied in Europe. Its sensitivity shown in European studies of 97-98%, almost double that of the CCV and its specificity is between 93-95% 2.4. When using the CH2-HPV and CCV together, the negative predictive value is extremely high, 99.9% in most studies. This means that the risk of having a neoplasm intracervical (NIC) Type 2 + was not observed in women in whom cervical cancer has sought both tests is very low, approximately 1 in 1000. The lower sensitivity in young women under 30 years is due to the high prevalence of HPV seen in late adolescents and young women, because of multiple partners present in the years following the initiation of sexual activity with the consequent development of sequential infections with different types of HPV. However, it is known today that most of these infections are transient. As the years go by women tend to have fewer sexual exposures and thus less new HPV infections, which causes the decline of HPV prevalence in women over 30 years.

Given the high negative predictive value associated with the two tests when both are negative, it was recommended that in this case is not necessary to revisit the women until 3 years after 5. This would save considerable resources of a costly for society and the state in the search or screening for cervical cancer.



daily clinical management problems - ASCUS and monitoring after treatment

One of the biggest problems when CH2 is used as driving-HPV positive women with HPV-negative CCV 5. The available studies show that the risk is less than 2% in the next 2 years for CIN 2 +, which is a low risk and are similar to those with negative CCV but not knowing the status of HPV, compared with those with ASC -US 6 (atypical squamous cells of undetermined Significance = atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance), the risk is between 5 and 17% in the latter case.

guidelines published in 2007 7, based on the low risk, recommended that in case of positive HPV CH2-negative CCV is not appropriate to have a colposcopy immediately, but to repeat both tests at 6-12 months. The CH2-HPV identified that half of patients with ASC-US were negative for malignancy.

A meta-analysis in the Netherlands and based on 9 prospective studies 8 CH2-HPV recommended for the control and subsequent monitoring of CIN 3. The negative predictive value obtained for recurrent disease / residual after treatment was 98% higher than the state of the resection margins, 93%, although these values \u200b\u200bbecome higher when combined with the CCV, 99% in both cases. Authors recommend control women with CIN 3, at 6 months with both tests. In case of positivity of one of the 2 tests, colposcopy should be done to these women. However, in 70% of women, according to their findings, both tests are negative at 6 months, making it possible to omit them control at 12 months. Recommended anyway dual control at 24 months, the risk of reinfection with high-risk HPV. If both tests come back negative in this time, you may refer them to the program routine screening.



Future According to the studies that have clearly shown that women infected with HPV 16 and 18 are at higher risk to develop a NIC 2 +, as other women infected by other high-risk HPV, are expected in the future the application of tests to identify the genotype of HPV 16, 33, 45 or 31, which are the 5 most common types found in cervical cancer.

The purpose of the search and cervical cancer screening is to reduce but not eliminate the risk of cervical cancer among the population subjected to screening or screening. Having a test such as CH2-HPV is to have available a molecular technique, which for reasons of sensitivity can make the CCV into obsolescence in the future.

important thing for the views expressed in this symposium, is to note that when new technology is introduced into daily clinical use, are present confusion unless you know what to do with the knowledge acquired for the benefit of patients. This technique is part of the concept of better define the risk in the detection of CIN 3, although treatable, to control the following query to determine how often and how intense must be measures in the monitoring or treatment patients. The previous model of the LCC and the associated additional colposcopy histology of biopsy obtained is a static model of false certainty, if not precisely the risk projected into the future and appropriate clinical response. Also, over time their use can save huge financial resources which are currently unavailable.

Representative Clinical Cases

A-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion low grade in the VCB, followed by a colposcopy directed biopsy, which showed a CIN 1
B-ASC-US in the CCV with CH2-HPV positive, why was colposcopy, during which no abnormalities were found


Some clinicians might consider treatment of histologically confirmed CIN 1 in the case A. But in fact both women, cases A and B have the same risk of 10 to 15% for the detection of CIN 3 / cancer in the next 2 years

C-Young woman under 30 who recently started their sexual life presents CH2-HPV positive, but its routine use is not recommended because the positive predictive value real and the risk is low, because with or without detectable lesions in the CCV, has a high probability that if you have an injury, this return spontaneously

Highlights

● The CCV has limited sensitivity in detecting cervical cancer in Colombia
● You will have modern DNA testing to identify high-risk HPV 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59 and 68
● This test allows to accurately identify women at risk for cervical cancer clarify the diagnosis and management of those who have ASC-US, and control those treated for CIN 3
● Its proper use will save financial resources to the program based on CCV


References

1 - Nanda K, McCrory DC, Myers ER, Bastian LA, Hasselblad V, Hickey JD, Matchar DB. Accuracy of the Papanicolaou test in screening for and follow-up of cervical cytologic Abnormalities: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med . 2000;132:810-9.
2- Wright TC. Cervical cancer screening in the 21st Century: Is it time to retire the PAP Smear ? Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 50:313-23.
3- “Fuente: Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística: http://www.dane.gov.co/ ”.
4- Castle PE, Sideri M, Jeronimo J, Solomon D, Schiffman M. Risk assessment to guide the prevention of cervical cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 197:356.e1-6.
5- Khan MJ, Castle PE, Lorincz AT,et al. The elevated 10-year risk of cervical pre-cancer and cancer in women with human papillomavirus ( HPV ) type 16 or 18 and the possible utility of type-specific HPV testing in clinical practice. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005; 97: 1072 -1079.
6-. Sherman ME, Schiffman M, Cox JT. Effects of age and human papilloma viral load on colposcpy triage: Data from the randomized atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance / low- grade squamous intraepithelial lesion triage study (ALTS). J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002; 94: 102-7.
7- Wright TC, Massad LS, Dunton CJ, Spitzer M, Wilkinson EJ, Solomon D, and for the 2 006 ASCCP-Sponsored Consensus Conference. 2006 consensus guidelines for the management of women with abnormal cervical cancer screening tests. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 197:346-55
8- Zielinski GD, Bais AG, Helmerhorst THJ, Verheijen RHM, of Schipper FA, Snijders PJF, Voorhorst FJ, van Kemenade FJ, Rozendaal L, Meijer CJLM. HPV testing and monitoring of Women after Treatment of CIN 3: Review of the literature and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2004, 59:543-53.




If you have any comments, questions or concerns, you can "click" on comments and sending your message.
Or if you prefer, you can send your comments, questions or concerns e-mail jaimeurdinolamd@gmail.com

Monday, January 28, 2008

Rent Amsale Bridal Gown



January 30, 2008
Prevention of fractures Risedronate in postmenopausal women with osteopenic
Urdinola Jaime MD
Medical Association Andes Bogotá DC Colombia Telephone 571/215 23 00
Symposium / Luncheon on Women's Health and Menopause
Association Medical Andes - Board Room - Wednesday, January 30, 2008



The World Health Organization (WHO) recommended initially included within the definition of osteoporosis, should be included in combination, the measurement of bone mineral density (BMD) and susceptibility to fracture.

As was noted that this definition was not very useful for clinical practice, WHO and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of America (NOF) agreed to define it in terms of BMD.

Osteopenia: BMD between -1 standard deviation (SD) and - 2.5 SD below the mean for young adults ("T" in bone densitometry.)

The 4 times more women develop osteoporosis than men due to estrogen deficiency during menopause.
A woman aged 80 has lost 80% of BMD, while man has lost only 25%.
The relationship of fractures of women to men is 7 / 1 of the vertebrae and 2 / 1 in the femoral head.

If we accept the 9% chance for a woman throughout her life in the U.S. develop breast cancer, that same woman will have 30% chance to develop an osteoporotic fracture.

Half of the women who reach age 70 will develop some type of osteoporotic fracture. So it is estimated that one of every 3 women will be postmenopausal osteoporotic fracture.

fractures in Colombia over 45 years old is ranked No. 5. in frequency of hospital discharges 1.
Moreover, the question of whom to treat has no single clear answer. There are two consensus that mark the current trend, the American Association of Endocrinology and the NOF 2 year 2 000, supported by the National Institutes of Health U.S. (NIH) 3 in 2 001.

In summary, the recommendation is to treat
- Menopausal women with a history of vertebral or hip fracture
- Those with a value of "T" ˂ 2.0 (or 2.5 According ˂ American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists
4) no risk factors
- Those with a value of "T" ˂ 1.5 with
risk factors - Those in the limit lower BMD with risk factors

But the decreased bone mass, defined as the range of osteopenia, osteoporosis can progress to if left untreated. Furthermore, it has already shown that about half of fragility fractures occur in women with osteopenia 5 .

With this background it is interesting to review the publication of Siris et al 6 , further analysis of 4 analysis study on the efficacy of risedronate (randomized controlled studies BMD Multinational, BMD North America, VERT Multinational and VERT North America), in reducing fractures in postmenopausal women osteopenia.

Short and concrete, interesting and positive is that risedronate reduced the risk of fractures in 73% (p = 0.023) in this population of women with decreased bone mass at the femoral neck and no prevalent vertebral fractures.

If half of fractures occur in osteopenic women, this underlines the need for a treatment to reduce this risk fracture.

The analysis of this study reports on the effect of risedronate in doses of 5 mg daily for 1.5 to 3 years compared with placebo in osteopenic women without prevalent vertebral fractures.

was also conducted a sensitivity analysis excluding patients who were osteopenic at the neck, but had a ˂ BMD 2.5 on the spine.
study included 620 women with osteopenia who received placebo (n = 309) or risedronate 5 mg (n = 311).
Risedronate reduced the risk for fragility fractures (which are composed incidental morphometric vertebral fractures and nonvertebral fractures related with osteoporosis, eg, six types of fractures including clavicle, humerus, wrist, pelvis, hip or leg, to include end-point analysis of fractures that can be confirmed radiologically) in 73% over 3 years.

The cumulative incidence of fragility fractures was 6.9% in patients receiving placebo vs. 2.2% in those treated with risedronate. The magnitude of this effect was similar in the subgroup of the sensitivity analysis.

Another fundamental contribution of this study is that despite the existing guideline recommendations for treating menopausal osteopenic (with decreased BMD), existing data are limited regarding the effectiveness of treatments for osteoporosis, in reducing fractures in these women. It must be remembered that there is an inherent difficulty in collecting such data in studies, since they are generally excluded women with values \u200b\u200bof "T" high, which may be in the range of osteopenia. Likewise, the incidence of fracture is lower compared to patients with osteoporosis.

The sensitivity study that included 293 women with BMD between - 2.5 and - 1 SD, the ratio of risk for fragility fractures was 0.22 (95% confidence interval, 0.03 - 2.02, p = 0.182 ) With a magnitude of effect similar to the analysis of the primary population. Not included in the study were patients with osteopenia simultaneously hip and spine.

benefits obtained in similar patients with alendronate and raloxifene are lower than those obtained with risedronate. But it should be noted that studies of these 2 compounds included women with prevalent vertebral fractures, what would categorize it as not as osteopenic and osteoporotic.

The benefit on fracture risk in postmenopausal osteopenic, observed with risedronate, is based in part on its action on bone microarchitecture, preserving trabecular architecture, trabecular number and thickness and separation. The effect is preserved in the long term.

But even the positive findings may be overestimated in relation to fracture risk in the general population of menopausal women, since the original studies were designed to examine the efficacy of risedronate in a population with osteoporosis should not forget that the osteopenia may be an important risk factor for fracture in the range of 10 years.

For this reason, the tratamientocon Risedronate is also indicated in these cases of osteopenia with apparent low risk for fracture.

Highlights

● Osteopenia: Bone mineral density (BMD) between -1 standard deviation (SD) and - 2.5 SD below the mean for young adults ("T" on bone densitometry)

● In general, a woman will have throughout his life, a 30% chance to present an osteoporotic fracture

● The osteopenia in women also means a risk factor for fracture

Risedronate reduced the risk of fractures in 73% (p = 0.023) in this population women with decreased bone mass at the femoral neck and no prevalent vertebral fractures

Question

- you is routine for women with osteopenia?
- or only those with osteoporosis is manifest?



References 1 - Consensus Development Conference. Diagnosis, Prophylaxis, and Treatment of osteoporosis. Am J Med 1993, 94: 646-650.
2 - Heinemann DF. Osteoporosis. An overview of the National Osteoporosis Foundation clinical practice guide. Geriatrics. 2000, 55:31-6.
3 - NIH Consensus Development Panel on Osteoporosis Prevention, Diagnosis, and Therapy. JAMA 2001; 285: 785 - 795th
4 - Hodgson SF , Watts NB , Bilezikian JP , Clarke BL , Gray TK , Harris DW , Johnston CC Jr , Kleerekoper M , Lindsay R , Luckey MM , McClung MR , Nankin HR , Petak SM , Recker RR , Anderson RJ , Bergman DA , Bloom Garden ZT , Dickey RA , Palumbo PJ , Peters AL , Rettinger HI , Rodbard HW , Rubenstein HA ; AACE Osteoporosis Task Force . American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists medical guidelines for clinical practice for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: 2001 edition, with selected updates for 2003. Endocr Pract. 2003;9:544-64.
5 - Sanders KM, Nicholson GC, Watts JJ, Pasco JA, Henry MJ, Kotowicz MA, Seeman E. Half the burden of fragility fractures in the community occur in women without osteoporosis. When is fracture prevention cost-effective? Bone. 2006 ;38:694-700.
6 - Siris ES, Simon JA, Barton IP, McClung MR, Grauer A. Effects of risedronate on fracture Risk in Women with postmenopausal osteopenia. DOI 10.1007/s00198-007-0493-y Int osteoporosis

If you have any comments, questions or concerns, you can "click" on comments and sending your message.
Or if you prefer, you can send your comments, questions or concerns e-mail jaimeurdinolamd@gmail.com