Thursday September 18, 2008
European Position Analysis: European guidelines for diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women
Urdinola Jaime MD
Medical Association Andes CS AK 9116 20 326 Bogotá DC Colombia
Phone 571/215 23 00
e-mail: jaimeurdinolamd@gmail.com - blogger: http://www.urdinola.blogspot.com / www.urdinolamenopausia2.blogspot.com
Symposium / Luncheon on Women's Health and Menopause
Andes Medical Association Board Room - Thursday, September 18, 2008
For reasons of space and time, emphasis will be summarized in aspects such as bone mineral density, the concept of osteopenia, general management measures, major pharmacological interventions available type and use the web through the instrument developed by WHO to calculate for the next 10 years, the probability of hip fracture or major osteoporotic fracture.
is suggested that other interesting subjects that can be found in the publication referred to, as the quantification of the burden of osteoporosis and the calculation of disability and lost life years (DALYs called in English) expansion of information on techniques for measuring bone mineral, the possibility of using combined and sequential treatments, adherence to treatment and the control thereof, other ways of assessing fracture risk, the investigation of patients with osteoporosis and health economics related to osteoporosis, will be consulted directly on it.
The most common sites for osteoporotic fractures are vertebral column, hip, distal forearm and proximal humerus. The remaining probability over the life of a menopausal woman to suffer fractures in any of these sites is approx. 40%, compared with 12% for breast cancer. Fractures in addition to being a major cause of morbidity, also can cause pain, loss of function, need for hospitalization and slow recovery and rehabilitation often incomplete. They can also be asymptomatic and recurrent as in the case of vertebral fractures and their social and personal costs are high. Also concerned that most / osteoporosis patients remain untreated.
measures bone mineral density (BMD) In \u200b\u200baddition to providing a diagnostic criterion, BMD measurements should indicate the prognosis of the likelihood of future fractures and a baseline that allows monitoring the natural history of the condition treated or not.
The currently used technique is DXA (dual energy absorptiometry of X-rays), which is very sensitive to tissue calcium content, which bone is the most important. Other techniques include quantitative ultrasound (QUS), quantitative computed tomography (QCT) applied to the appendicular skeleton and spine, peripheral DXA, the digital radiogrametría X-ray, X-ray absorptiometry. X-ray technology can also determine bone strength of cortical bone and trabecular bone, including macro and micro.
Prevalence of osteoporosis
Limitations of the application of DXA The presence of osteomalacia as a complication of malnutrition in elderly patients with decreased BMD due to decreased bone mineralization. The osteartrosis and osteoarthritis of the spine and hip are common in the elderly, increasing BMD, but not its strength. Osteoarthritis, a previous fracture or scoliosis produce heterogeneity of BMD and should be excluded from the analysis. As BMD is two dimensional and measure the area and no bone volume, the volume of bone density is increased. This error will be beneficial to the extent that large bones have more strength.
General management
The elderly high prevalence failure of calcium, protein and vitamin D. Adequate amount of protein intake is necessary to maintain the integrity and function of organs such as skeletal muscles and bones. Calcium supplements for at least 1 000 mg / day and vitamin D at doses of 800 IU per day reduced the risk of secondary hyperparathyroidism and the risk of proximal femoral fracture, and 1 g / kg of body weight per day of protein for management of patients with osteoporosis. Main
pharmacological interventions
anti-fracture efficacy of the treatments most frequently used in postmenopausal osteoporosis when given with calcium and vitamin D, randomized and placebo-controlled
Effect on risk Effect on vertebral fracture vertebral fracture risk
establecidaa Agent osteoporosis osteoporosis osteoporosis osteoporosis establecidaa
Alendronate + + ND + including hip
Risedronate + + ND + including hip
Ibandronate ND ND + + b
zoledronate + + ND ND + c
TH + + + + + +
Raloxifene Teriparatide
ND ND ND + ND +
ranelate + + + + includes hip hip includes
Strontium Osteoporosis osteoporosis = - + = effective medication - ND = no available evidence - a = woman previous vertebral fracture
- b = only in subgroups of patients (post-study analysis) - c = JWG patients / without prevalent vertebral fractures - Updated as 2-3 in 1
The oral availability is low, between 1 to 3% of the dose taken and interfered with by food, calcium, iron, coffee, tea and orange juice. Are purged rapidly from plasma, 50% deposited in bone and the remainder excreted in the urine. Its half-life is prolonged.
Risedronate 35 mg weekly and alendronate 70 mg weekly are most commonly used bisphosphonates in the world.
In the FIT study, alendronate shown to reduce the incidence of vertebral, wrist and hip in approximately half of the cases, women with prevalent vertebral fractures. In women without prevalent vertebral fractures, there was no significant reduction in clinical fractures in the total population, although the reduction was significant in 1 / 3 of patients had a T value of baseline in hip BMD ˂ -2.5 standard deviations. Risedronate
shown to reduce the incidence of vertebral and non vertebral fractures by 40 to 50% and 30 to 36%, respectively. In a large population of elderly women Risedronate significantly reduced the risk of hip fracture by 30% and the effect was greater among women aged 70 to 79 years old with osteoporosis, 40%.
dose ibandronate 2.5 mg daily reduces the risk of vertebral fractures by 50 - 60%, while the effect on nonvertebral fractures has only been demonstrated so far in postestudio analysis of women with a baseline value of T in BMD ˂ - 3 standard deviations. A noninferiority trial has shown the equivalence of the oral dose of 150 mg monthly, allowing approval for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Similarly, comparative studies between oral and IV doses led to the adoption of the IV dose of 3 mg.
A Phase III study of postmenopausal women with 7 500 osteoporosis to determine the effectiveness of the annual infusion of 5 mg zoledronate for 3 years found that the incidence of vertebral fractures was reduced by 70% and 40% hip.
Etidronate is a weak bisphosphonate proven to reduce vertebral fractures after 2 years of use but not thereafter, without significant effect on nonvertebral fractures. For this reason it is not recommended as first-line treatment for osteoporosis
should be emphasized that the safety profile of bisphosphonates is generally favorable. Oral bisphosphonates are associated with mild gastrointestinal disorders and some of them, alendronate and pamidronate, may rarely cause esophagitis. Aminobisphosphonates IV can induce a transient acute reaction with fever and muscle and bone pain, which usually disappears or decreases in the course of the following applications. Osteonecrosis of the jaw has been described in cancer patients receiving large doses of pamidronate or zoledronate. The incidence in osteoporotic patients treated with oral and IV bisphosphonates appear to be extremely low, about 1 in 100 000 cases and so far the causal relationship to bisphosphonate therapy has not been established. ●
Peptides and family of parathyroid hormone (PTH)
strontium ranelate
● Calcitonin
hormonal therapy (HT) in menopausal sex steroids
Observational studies and randomized controlled trials with placebo have shown that estrogen reduces the risk of vertebral and nonvertebral, including hip, about 30% regardless of baseline BMD.
But when HT is discontinued, bone loss is restarted at the same rate that occurs after menopause, although the fracture protection may persist for several years.
The findings of the WHI study (Study of the Health Initiative of Women) suggests however, that the long-term risks outweigh the benefits, 30% increase in risk for coronary heart disease and breast cancer, as well as 40 % de aumento en el riesgo para accidente cerebrovascular.
Mujeres histerectomizadas que recibieron sólo estrógenos conjugados presentaron aumento significativo para accidente cerebrovascular, pero no en enfermedad cardíaca coronaria ni en cáncer de seno, sugiriendo un efecto deletéreo del acetato de medroxiprogesterona. Aún se debate exdtensamente si los beneficios de la TH con otro tipo de gestágeno y en mujeres postmenopáusicas jóvenes podrían exceder los riesgos, pero no hay disponible un estudio aleatorizado y controlado con placebo que demuestre la seguridad a largo plazo de esta alternativa.
Finalmente, se debe recordar que en la mayoría de países del mundo, el uso de la TH sólo está approved for the management of menopausal symptoms in the lowest dose possible and for a limited period of time.
So today is not recommended as first line therapy treatment for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. ●
vitamin D derivatives
Alfacalcidol is a synthetic analogue of calcitriol metabolite (1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D) and is metabolized to calcitriol in the liver, although less potent than the latter. Several studies of both agents showed a decrease in vertebral fracture risk, but their effects on BMD have been less studied. Some reports speak of their direct positive effect on muscle strength, decreasing the likelihood of falls, especially in the elderly. But the biggest problem with the use of derivatives of vitamin Des risk of hypercalcemia and hypercalciuria, which in prolonged can lead to renal failure and nephrocalcinosis. The narrow therapeutic window requires frequent monitoring of serum and urinary calcium in these patients. Therefore, calcium supplementation should be avoided or used with great care. ●
algorithm developed by WHO
http://shef.ac.uk/FRAX
Summary of Important
● The International Osteoporosis Foundation provides some updated guidelines for diagnosis and management of osteoporosis, reviewing the role of determining bone mineral density for the diagnosis, assessment of fracture risk general management and drug therapy, treatment control, how to do research for patients and economic analysis of treatment
References
1 - Kanis JA, Burlet N, Cooper C , Delmas PD, Reginster JY, Borgstrom F, Rizzoli R, European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis (ESCE). European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal Women. Osteoporosis Int 2008, 19: 399-428.
2 - Delmas PD. Treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis . Lancet 2002, 359: 2018-2026.
3 - Boonen S, Body JJ Boutsen Y, Devogelaer JP, Goemaere S, Kaufman JM, et al. Evidence-based guidelines for the Treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: a consensus document of the Belgian Bone Club. Osteoporosis Int 2005, 16: 239-254.
If you have any comments, questions or concerns, you can "click" on comments and sending your message. Or if you prefer, you can send your comments, questions or concerns e-mail jaimeurdinolamd@gmail.com